These are the TREASONISTS that brought the suit against the Military. They revealed Top Military Secrets!

"The National Trust for Historic Preservation" is a beautiful name, but even their name is fakebecause when they add the words "in the United States" to the National Trust for HistoricPreservation, it makes it sound like a Governmental Agency, which it is not. In fact, the UnitedStates refused to continue funding it in 2005 because they strongly disagreed with their missionand objectives. They are very bad for our Country. They stop many projects that are worthy, andhurt many others. In this case, they are trying to stop one that is vital to our National Security, andthe Safety of all Presidents of the United States, both current and future, their families, staff, andCabinet members. They were asked by the United States Military not to bring this suit because ofthe Top Secret nature of the important facility being built. They were shown detailed plans andspecifications of this knitted, unified, and cohesive structure by Top Officers and Leaders in boththe Military and Secret Service. But this did not deter them because they suffer from TrumpDerangement Syndrome, commonly referred to as TDS, as noted by Democrat Senator JohnFetterman, of Pennsylvania. The lower section does not work without the upper section and,likewise, the upper section does not work without the lower. It is all one highly integrated unit.

The then President of the National Trust, who brought the case, Carol Quillen, had no backgroundin Historic Preservation, and has been replaced, unanimously, effective immediately. This is similarto her departure from Davidson College, where she was, likewise, dismissed, but the people of ourCountry are forced to live on with her bad decision, especially that of revealing to everyone,including our enemies throughout the World, the Top Secret Military features of the Building thatare already built, and/or under construction, such as the DronePort, which occupies the entire roof.

There is absolutely no argument that a woman walking her dog in the vicinity of the White Househas STANDING to stop such a desperately needed National Security structure for the people of theUnited States of America, as it will provide Presidents, current and future, a secure space to dotheir jobs, especially when she never saw the Building, because it had not risen, and she had norendering, or pictures of the Building because they, also, were in the formative stages ofproduction. This woman is not a "walker," she is an activist, or serial plaintiff, who is involved inmuch other frivolous litigation throughout the City. In fact, whenever the National Trust files alawsuit, she seems to be involved. So, she walked at the site of the White House, where there wasno Building, and it bothered her, but she also walks in front of all of those other places, where shemust also be bothered, and hence, additional court cases? She has no Clearances, or expertisewhatsoever, in National Security, Defense, or required protections for the President. She hasabsolutely no standing to be involved in this case and, in fact, her name is not even mentioned as aplaintiff in the case! It is this kind of gross and flagrant abuse of our Courts that is exactly whyAmericans are losing faith in our System of Justice. It is so bad for our Country! President DONALD